This week in a meeting amongst stores and buyers, the topic was a very stylish and well-constructed kid’s bed. The buyer had recently reduced the price (again!) from $648 to $598, and was asking the stores: what’s happening with this bed? It’s fun, has lots of storage and functionality, and the price is less than half of retail. The stores said it gets a lot of looks, but the above-$600 price tag for a kid’s bed is off-putting. So, we’re trying it at another price level, and I hope it will work.
Today I did a quick Internet search to see what retailers were selling it and at what price: every quoted price I saw was 4 figures. Our retail is so far below the market value it’s not funny.
Which just made me think (again) how powerful it would be to enable the customer to combine the benefits of Internet search (comparison pricing, reviews etc) with her in-store experience. Sure, we could allow the customers to use our showroom PCs to comp shop while in the store, but it would be so much more powerful if the customer could take a picture of the item (or its 2D barcode) with her own phone to search for and display comparative prices, specs, and reviews. Although our price tags declare the comparative retail price, how much more credible that price would be if the customer could verify the actual retail from other retailers’ websites.